Cardiovascular risk factors in immigrants: an intersectional real world data approach to understand health inequalities
Collazo, Yuleydy ; Gamba, Adriana ; Malo, Sara (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Rabanaque, MJ (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Carela, Francisco Javier ; Aguilar-Palacio, Isabel (Universidad de Zaragoza)
Resumen: Cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) are shaped by social determinants of health. Lower CVRFs frequency in immigrants, as reported in the literature, may oversimplify a group affected by multiple and intersecting social inequities. Using the framework of intersectionality, we aim to analyse the prevalence of CVRFs using Real-World Data (RWD), in immigrants to better understand how overlapping social identities shape health outcomes.
Methods. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the immigrant population of the CARhES cohort (45,861) a population cohort of RWD of CVRFs’ patients. In order to characterise the most privileged and oppressed immigrant groups, we considered the impact of country of origin, age group, gender, income level and place of residence on the prevalence of CVRFs. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the effect of socioeconomic characteristics on the presence of three CVRFs. To explore intersectionality, logistic regression models with interactions assessed how sociodemographic variables jointly influenced the presence of three CVRFs. Coefficients were tested for significance using the Wald test, and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with their 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results. The prevalence of CVRFs was higher in immigrant men, living in urban areas, and increased with aging and low income. The strongest association between socioeconomic variables and the presence of three CVRFs was found in people 65–79 years and among Europeans. This association was independent of their time in the country. Intersectional strata with more CVRFs included individuals aged 65–79 in urban areas, Latin American and Caribbean men and African women. Intersectional analyses showed that African immigrants from urban areas had a higher probability of having the three CVRFs (OR: 1.66, CI = 1.30–2.11), as did African women (OR: 1.40, CI = 1.15–1.69). Females in the most oppressed axes of inequality showed a higher frequency of CVRFs than males. Conclusions. Intersectional approach reveals that the most disadvantaged groups regarding CVRFs include older Latin American and Caribbean men and African women in urban areas. Women facing multiple layers of social oppression are particularly at risk. This RWD-based approach enables the identification of at-risk groups and supports the design of equitable, data-driven health interventions.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-24874-8
Año: 2025
Publicado en: BMC PUBLIC HEALTH 25, 1 (2025), 11 pp.
ISSN: 1471-2458
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA-GRISSA/B09-23R
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII/PI22-01193
Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Medic.Prevent.Salud Públ. (Dpto. Microb.Ped.Radio.Sal.Pú.)
0
Exportado de SIDERAL (2025-11-27-15:16:18)
Methods. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the immigrant population of the CARhES cohort (45,861) a population cohort of RWD of CVRFs’ patients. In order to characterise the most privileged and oppressed immigrant groups, we considered the impact of country of origin, age group, gender, income level and place of residence on the prevalence of CVRFs. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the effect of socioeconomic characteristics on the presence of three CVRFs. To explore intersectionality, logistic regression models with interactions assessed how sociodemographic variables jointly influenced the presence of three CVRFs. Coefficients were tested for significance using the Wald test, and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with their 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results. The prevalence of CVRFs was higher in immigrant men, living in urban areas, and increased with aging and low income. The strongest association between socioeconomic variables and the presence of three CVRFs was found in people 65–79 years and among Europeans. This association was independent of their time in the country. Intersectional strata with more CVRFs included individuals aged 65–79 in urban areas, Latin American and Caribbean men and African women. Intersectional analyses showed that African immigrants from urban areas had a higher probability of having the three CVRFs (OR: 1.66, CI = 1.30–2.11), as did African women (OR: 1.40, CI = 1.15–1.69). Females in the most oppressed axes of inequality showed a higher frequency of CVRFs than males. Conclusions. Intersectional approach reveals that the most disadvantaged groups regarding CVRFs include older Latin American and Caribbean men and African women in urban areas. Women facing multiple layers of social oppression are particularly at risk. This RWD-based approach enables the identification of at-risk groups and supports the design of equitable, data-driven health interventions.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-24874-8
Año: 2025
Publicado en: BMC PUBLIC HEALTH 25, 1 (2025), 11 pp.
ISSN: 1471-2458
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA-GRISSA/B09-23R
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII/PI22-01193
Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Medic.Prevent.Salud Públ. (Dpto. Microb.Ped.Radio.Sal.Pú.)
0
Exportado de SIDERAL (2025-11-27-15:16:18)
Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
articulos > articulos-por-area > medicina_preventiva_y_salud_publica
Notice créée le 2025-11-27, modifiée le 2025-11-27
Liens externes:
Versión publicada
Versión publicada
Versión publicada
Versión publicada